2007年考研英语阅览真题及解析【第四篇】(2007年考研英语)--考研网上

passage4注解：标题为赤色，翻译为蓝色，分析为绿色。????????it never rains but it pours. just as bosses and boards have finally sorted out their worst accounting and compliance(遵守，恪守(这儿是指公司的规章准则))? troubles, and improved their feeble(虚弱的，虚弱的) corporation governance(控制方法，打点办法(govern.v.控制)), a new problem threatens to earn them—especially in america—the sort of nasty(凶狠的，令人厌烦的) headlines that inevitably lead to heads rolling in the executive suite((领导套房，这儿代指“领导层”)): data insecurity. left, until now, to odd, low-level it staff to put right, and seen as a concern only of data-rich industries such as banking, telecoms and air travel, information protection is now high on the boss’s agenda in businesses of every variety.
【
回想四个单词：
1.compliance遵守，因为compliment奖赏，所以compliance。
2.feeable谐音“飞吧”，飞吧，飞不起来了吧==虚弱的，虚弱的；还可以经过词的规划回想：fee费用+able使人可以=听到费用就使人软了，使人虚弱=虚弱的，虚弱的。
3.nasty谐音补音“拿屎投”，那自个拿屎投你，你说恶不厌烦。nasty厌烦的，凶狠的。
4.suite套房，规划回想：suit西装+e=人生的作业进入第一层境地是穿上西装出场，进入第二层境地就是具有自个的套房。suit有西装的意思，作动词的时分有“与某某匹配”，一般分配是suit to 某某，翻译“与某某匹配”。
】
????????several massive leakages((秘要,文件)泄露，(气体,液体)泄露)?of customer and employee data this year—from organizations as diverse as time warner, the american defense contractor science applications international corp and even the university of california, berkeley—have left managers hurriedly peering into((凝视，窥探，这儿是指代“细心查看”))their intricate((intricate错综凌乱的；难了解的=complicated错综凌乱的；难了解的)) it systems and business processes in search of potential vulnerabilities.
【
1.leakage(秘要,文件)泄露，(气体,液体)泄露，其实来历于动词leak泄露，
罗列一下词汇中带有lea的单词，从a到z:?
leach 过滤 lead引领? leaf叶子 league联盟 leak泄露 leam发光 lean身子倾斜? leap跳动 lease租约 leave脱离?
】
????????“data is becoming an asset which needs to be guarded as much as any other asset,” says haim mendelson of stanford university’s business school. “the ability to guard customer data is the key to market value, which the board is responsible for on behalf of shareholders”. indeed, just as there is the concept of generally accepted accounting principles (gaap), perhaps it is time for gasp, generally accepted security practices, suggested eli noam of new york’s columbia business school. “setting the proper investment level for security, redundancy(冗余), and recovery is a management issue, not a technical one,” he says.
????????the mystery is that this should come as a surprise to any boss. surely it should be obvious to the dimmest((dim愚笨的),这儿是描述词最高档) executive that trust, that most valuable of economic assets, is easily destroyed and hugely expensive to restore— and that few things are more likely to destroy trust than a company letting sensitive personal data get into the wrong hands.
????????the current state of affairs may have been encouraged—though not justified—by the lack of legal penalty(赏罚) (in america, but not europe) for data leakage. until california recently passed a law, american firms did not have to tell anyone, even the victim, when data went astray(迷失，迷路). that may change fast: lots of proposed data-security legislation is now doing the rounds in washington, d.c. meanwhile, the theft(偷盗，盗窃) of information about some 40 million cred

it-card accounts in america, disclosed(泄露，揭露) on june 17th, overshadowed(使相形见绌，使相形见绌，使没趣)?a hugely important decision a day earlier by america’s federal trade commission (ftc) that puts corporate america on notice that regulators will act if firms fail to provide adequate data security.

一、文章规划分析这篇文章是一篇关于信息年代数据泄露疑问的文章。
文章第一段指出数据平安疑问变成各作业打点层高度注重的疑问。
第二段说到一些大公司的许多客户和雇员信息泄露，使打点者初步注重公司的信息维护。
第三段引证多位专家的话指出，维护客户信息的重要性。
第四段批判有些公司老总不知道道到信息维护的重要性，它对公司的信赖度极具损坏力。
第五段分分呈现数据泄露这一疑问的可以缘由，指出立法是处置疑问的根柢将来。
留心时文的特征：以“垂钓”方法最初，主题常在第一段末或第二段初步。

36. the statement “it never rains but it pours” is used to introduce
[a] the fierce business competition.
[b] the feeble boss-board relations.
[c] the threat from news reports.
[d] the severity of data leakage.
36．作者用“it never rains but it pours”这句话是为了引出。
[a] 剧烈的公司竞赛
[b] 老板和董事会之间脆弱的联络
[c] 来自新闻报导的挟制
[d] 数据泄露的严峻性

37. according to paragraph 2, some organizations check their systems to find out
[a] whether there is any weak point.
[b] what sort of data has been stolen.
[c] who is responsible for the leakage.
[d] how the potential spies can be located.
37．根据第二段，一些机构查看自个的体系，意图是为了查明。
[a] 是不是存在缺陷
[b] 啥类型的数据被盗了
[c] 谁大约对数据泄露担任
[d] 如何找到间谍嫌疑人

38. in bringing up the concept of gasp the author is making the point that
[a] shareholders’ interests should be properly attended to.
[b] information protection should be given due attention.
[c] businesses should enhance their level of accounting security.
[d] the market value of customer data should be emphasized.
38．作者提出 gasp 这一概念，是想阐明。
[a] 股东的利益大约给予恰当的照看
[b] 信息维护疑问大约遭到恰当的重视
[c] 公司大约前进自个的财务平安水平
[d] 客户数据的商场价值应当遭到注重

39. according to paragraph 4, what puzzles the author is that some bosses fail to
[a] see the link between trust and data protection.
[b] perceive the sensitivity of personal data.
[c] realize the high cost of data restoration.
[d] appreciate the economic value of trust.
39．根据第四段，作者感到不解的是一些老板没有。
[a] 看到信赖和数据维护之间的联络
[b] 知道到自个数据的活络性
[c] 知道到数据找回需付出的高昂价值
[d] 了解信赖的经济价值

40. it can be inferred from paragraph 5 that
[a] data leakage is more severe in europe.
[b] ftc’s decision is essential to data security.
[c] california takes the lead in security legislation.
[d] legal penalty is a major solution to data leakage.
40．从第五段可以揣度出。
[a] 数据泄露在欧洲更为严峻
[b] 美国联邦生意委员会的抉择对数据平安来说对错常重要的
[c] 加州在平安立法方面处于抢先方位
[d] 法令惩办办法是处置数据泄露疑问的首要办法

二、中心词汇与超纲词汇1. sort out 处置
2. nasty adj. 龌龊的，令人厌烦的
3. roll in 蜂拥而来
4. massive adj. 厚重的，大块的
5. peer vi. 凝视，窥探
6. potential adj. 潜在的，可以的
7. shareholder n. 股东
8. redundancy n. 冗余
9. do the rounds 灵敏传开；巡视
10. astray adv. 迷路地，误入歧途地
11. proposed adj. 被提议的
12. legislation n. 立法，法令的拟定

三、阅览答案：d a b a d四、全文翻译：?????????不雨则以，一雨倾盆。当老板和董事会总算处置了最糟糕的财务和规章疑问并加强了公司打点力度之后，一个新的疑问——数据平安疑问——正挟制着他们，使他们呈如今令人厌烦的(特别是美国的)头版头条新闻中，这些报导可以究竟致使领导层更迭。信息维护曩昔一向是暂时、初级信息技能职工的作业，而且只被比方银行、电信、航空这类具有很大都据的作业所重视，而如今却高高列在各行各业老板的日程表上。
????????本年发生的几起严峻的客户和职工数据泄露作业发生在林林总总的机构里，包括年代华纳公司、美国国防项目承办(建)机构科学使用世界公司、甚至加州大学伯克立分校。这些作业使打点者们匆促细心查看自个公司里凌乱精密的信息技能体系和事务流程，以寻找可以存在的平安风险。斯坦福大学商学院的汉姆·孟德尔森说：“数据正在变成一种资产，与任何另外资产相同，它也需要遭到维护”。“维护客户数据的才能是保证商场价值的要害，董事会有责任为了股东的利益对商场价值担任。”纽约哥伦比亚商学院的伊利·诺姆主张说，实际上，正如有公认会计原则相同，或许如今大约拟定公认平安原则了。他还说：“为数据平安、数据备份和数据找回树立恰当的出资标准是打点疑问，不是技能疑问。”
????????令人不解的是这竟然令老板们大吃一惊。甚至最愚笨的打点人员也必定理解地晓得：信赖，这个经济资产中最有价值的东西，很简略遭到损坏而恢复起来则价值高昂；没有啥比公司任由秘要自个信息落入胸怀叵测的人手中更能损坏信赖的了。
????????对泄露数据短少法令赏罚(这首要指在美国，在欧洲不是这样)，可所以构成当前情况的缘由——尽管并不料味着泄露数据合法。直到加利福尼亚州迩来经过了一项法令，美国的公司才不得不把数据泄露作业告诉我们——包括受害者。改变可以会发生得很灵敏：环绕数据平安提出的许多立法正在华盛顿打开谈论。一起，发生在美国的约 4000 万诺言卡账户信息被盗的作业于 6 月 17 日被宣告出来，可就在前一天，美国联邦生意委员会做出一项严峻抉择，这项抉择警告美国的公司：假定公司不能对数据的平安供给充分保证，打点机构将采纳行为。盗窃作业给这项抉择蒙上了阴影。

未经允许不得转载：考研网上 - 考研网上辅导班有用吗 > 2007年考研英语阅览真题及解析【第四篇】(2007年考研英语)